<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free and open source alternative to ShareThis, AddThis, AddToAny</title>
	<atom:link href="http://frankkoehl.com/2009/03/free-open-source-alternative-sharethis-addthis-addtoany/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://frankkoehl.com/2009/03/free-open-source-alternative-sharethis-addthis-addtoany/</link>
	<description>The more you know, the more you don't know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 03:09:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Borris</title>
		<link>http://frankkoehl.com/2009/03/free-open-source-alternative-sharethis-addthis-addtoany/comment-page-1/#comment-3814</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Borris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankkoehl.com/?p=429#comment-3814</guid>
		<description>Fantastic post Frank! 

Great to hear the opinions from the developers too.

I&#039;m doing a little research into the major social sharing providers such as: AddThis, ShareThis, AddToAny etc.

There&#039;s no &#039;About Us&#039; on the iBegin site.

Can someone provide details regarding:

01. Who founded iBegin?
02. Key People?
03. Current reach (how many users have installed it?)
04. Sites (how many sites is it on?),
05. Alexa Traffic rank?
06. Plugins / Extension supported?
07. Any examples of iBegin in use in the real world - on big named sites?
08. How often it&#039;s updated
09. Last significant update
10. Future plans...Addtoany, sharethis and addthis have some good added value services e.g. ShareThisStream.

I prefer the iBegin model it&#039;s faster and slicker and the large icons are great. (printer icon could do with being revised) but, I&#039;m concerned that iBegin lacks features and will not be able to compete with aforementioned social sharing providers.

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic post Frank! </p>
<p>Great to hear the opinions from the developers too.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m doing a little research into the major social sharing providers such as: AddThis, ShareThis, AddToAny etc.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no &#8216;About Us&#8217; on the iBegin site.</p>
<p>Can someone provide details regarding:</p>
<p>01. Who founded iBegin?<br />
02. Key People?<br />
03. Current reach (how many users have installed it?)<br />
04. Sites (how many sites is it on?),<br />
05. Alexa Traffic rank?<br />
06. Plugins / Extension supported?<br />
07. Any examples of iBegin in use in the real world &#8211; on big named sites?<br />
08. How often it&#8217;s updated<br />
09. Last significant update<br />
10. Future plans&#8230;Addtoany, sharethis and addthis have some good added value services e.g. ShareThisStream.</p>
<p>I prefer the iBegin model it&#8217;s faster and slicker and the large icons are great. (printer icon could do with being revised) but, I&#8217;m concerned that iBegin lacks features and will not be able to compete with aforementioned social sharing providers.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephan Sokolow</title>
		<link>http://frankkoehl.com/2009/03/free-open-source-alternative-sharethis-addthis-addtoany/comment-page-1/#comment-3792</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephan Sokolow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankkoehl.com/?p=429#comment-3792</guid>
		<description>If you have even rudimentary JS skills, Another option for solving the loading-time issue on scripts which may not be deferrable, is to use the noscript tag and a static, inline document.write to display a throbber if JS is enabled (I suggest one of the mid-sized circular ones from http://ajaxload.info/) and then, using an onDOMComplete wrapper (I use jQuery&#039;s $(document).ready()), inject the AddThis/AddToAny code after the page has been fully rendered.

That&#039;s what I&#039;ll be doing as soon as I can find the time to implement it as a WordPress plugin. (I don&#039;t like having to remember that I&#039;m using a modified theme and jQuery doesn&#039;t come standard)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have even rudimentary JS skills, Another option for solving the loading-time issue on scripts which may not be deferrable, is to use the noscript tag and a static, inline document.write to display a throbber if JS is enabled (I suggest one of the mid-sized circular ones from <a href="http://ajaxload.info/)" rel="nofollow">http://ajaxload.info/)</a> and then, using an onDOMComplete wrapper (I use jQuery&#8217;s $(document).ready()), inject the AddThis/AddToAny code after the page has been fully rendered.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what I&#8217;ll be doing as soon as I can find the time to implement it as a WordPress plugin. (I don&#8217;t like having to remember that I&#8217;m using a modified theme and jQuery doesn&#8217;t come standard)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eliZZZa</title>
		<link>http://frankkoehl.com/2009/03/free-open-source-alternative-sharethis-addthis-addtoany/comment-page-1/#comment-3768</link>
		<dc:creator>eliZZZa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 19:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankkoehl.com/?p=429#comment-3768</guid>
		<description>Hi Frank,
great article! Just found it, when I was desperately searching for a solution for a loading time of &gt;1 minute for my site nadelspiel.com (seeing the attempt to loading static.addtoany in the browser bar).
Changed to ShareThis immediately (WP plugin) - loading time perfect now.
Will let you know, how it works for me...

Kind regards from Austria,
eliZZZa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Frank,<br />
great article! Just found it, when I was desperately searching for a solution for a loading time of &gt;1 minute for my site nadelspiel.com (seeing the attempt to loading static.addtoany in the browser bar).<br />
Changed to ShareThis immediately (WP plugin) &#8211; loading time perfect now.<br />
Will let you know, how it works for me&#8230;</p>
<p>Kind regards from Austria,<br />
eliZZZa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Miller</title>
		<link>http://frankkoehl.com/2009/03/free-open-source-alternative-sharethis-addthis-addtoany/comment-page-1/#comment-3744</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankkoehl.com/?p=429#comment-3744</guid>
		<description>Thanks. Great discussion. I&#039;ve been researching the Flash tracking issue with AddThis and have pretty much decided to switch to AddToAny. For me, the AddToAny design is so well resolved, and the fact that it updates itself is so helpful, I just can&#039;t resist it. The level of polish is significant and very appealing. Having that 99% of the time is good enough for me (I&#039;ve actually never had it go down for me on any of the sites I see using it.) 

Now about the external dependency issue, the important thing to me is to choose my external dependency wisely. For example, unless I&#039;m missing something, this page uses reCaptcha, which is an external dependency, right? I assume it&#039;s being used because there is no free alternative? At my office we&#039;re not allowed to use this reCaptcha tool because of the external dependency problem (so we had to buy a commercial version). However, we are allowed to use AddThis or AddToAny. For us, a security tool like captcha is more important than a sharing tool, so we disallow the external dependency for security-related functions and allow it for non-critical functions like sharing. 

For sharing we go for beauty and user experience over all else, and that&#039;s where I think AddToAny really shines. 

Thanks again for the great site!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. Great discussion. I&#8217;ve been researching the Flash tracking issue with AddThis and have pretty much decided to switch to AddToAny. For me, the AddToAny design is so well resolved, and the fact that it updates itself is so helpful, I just can&#8217;t resist it. The level of polish is significant and very appealing. Having that 99% of the time is good enough for me (I&#8217;ve actually never had it go down for me on any of the sites I see using it.) </p>
<p>Now about the external dependency issue, the important thing to me is to choose my external dependency wisely. For example, unless I&#8217;m missing something, this page uses reCaptcha, which is an external dependency, right? I assume it&#8217;s being used because there is no free alternative? At my office we&#8217;re not allowed to use this reCaptcha tool because of the external dependency problem (so we had to buy a commercial version). However, we are allowed to use AddThis or AddToAny. For us, a security tool like captcha is more important than a sharing tool, so we disallow the external dependency for security-related functions and allow it for non-critical functions like sharing. </p>
<p>For sharing we go for beauty and user experience over all else, and that&#8217;s where I think AddToAny really shines. </p>
<p>Thanks again for the great site!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oliva</title>
		<link>http://frankkoehl.com/2009/03/free-open-source-alternative-sharethis-addthis-addtoany/comment-page-1/#comment-1158</link>
		<dc:creator>oliva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankkoehl.com/?p=429#comment-1158</guid>
		<description>awesome article and many comments that are useful
i have realized that flashy shiny icon as social bookmarking slowed my page down, so right now i am testing various one, including ibegin.

great site</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>awesome article and many comments that are useful<br />
i have realized that flashy shiny icon as social bookmarking slowed my page down, so right now i am testing various one, including ibegin.</p>
<p>great site</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon</title>
		<link>http://frankkoehl.com/2009/03/free-open-source-alternative-sharethis-addthis-addtoany/comment-page-1/#comment-1096</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 15:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankkoehl.com/?p=429#comment-1096</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this informative post. We&#039;ve been debating which bookmarking plugin to use for our wordpress powered blog and this gives us something to work from.

What I initially like about iBegin Share over the others is the ability to convert posts to pdf and word docs, which is an important features to offer our users. We&#039;re a travel blog and letting them make their own travel guides this way is useful in travel planning.

Thanks, Frank, for all this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this informative post. We&#8217;ve been debating which bookmarking plugin to use for our wordpress powered blog and this gives us something to work from.</p>
<p>What I initially like about iBegin Share over the others is the ability to convert posts to pdf and word docs, which is an important features to offer our users. We&#8217;re a travel blog and letting them make their own travel guides this way is useful in travel planning.</p>
<p>Thanks, Frank, for all this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://frankkoehl.com/2009/03/free-open-source-alternative-sharethis-addthis-addtoany/comment-page-1/#comment-821</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 14:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankkoehl.com/?p=429#comment-821</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re absolutely right, Sacha. Remote javascript is download by the browser at the request of the page being served by your web server. The server&#039;s only job is to tell the browser, &quot;Hey, get this from over there.&quot;

My verbage was simply a typo, consequence of a train of thoughts getting smashed together while writing the post. I&#039;ve changed the entry, and thanks for pointing it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re absolutely right, Sacha. Remote javascript is download by the browser at the request of the page being served by your web server. The server&#8217;s only job is to tell the browser, &#8220;Hey, get this from over there.&#8221;</p>
<p>My verbage was simply a typo, consequence of a train of thoughts getting smashed together while writing the post. I&#8217;ve changed the entry, and thanks for pointing it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sacha</title>
		<link>http://frankkoehl.com/2009/03/free-open-source-alternative-sharethis-addthis-addtoany/comment-page-1/#comment-819</link>
		<dc:creator>Sacha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 10:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankkoehl.com/?p=429#comment-819</guid>
		<description>You wrote:

Pay attention specifically to src=&quot;http://w.sharethis.com/button/sharethis.js[...]“. It’s just a normal URL, like any page you visit. This means that each time the page is loaded, your web server goes off to retrieve a copy of the javascript required to display the button


This isn&#039;t true; it&#039;s the user&#039;s browser that fetches the URL, so there is no impact on your server&#039;s bandwidth. There is an impact on the page load time for the user, and on w.sharethis.com&#039;s bandwidth, but not on your web server.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You wrote:</p>
<p>Pay attention specifically to src=&#8221;http://w.sharethis.com/button/sharethis.js[...]“. It’s just a normal URL, like any page you visit. This means that each time the page is loaded, your web server goes off to retrieve a copy of the javascript required to display the button</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t true; it&#8217;s the user&#8217;s browser that fetches the URL, so there is no impact on your server&#8217;s bandwidth. There is an impact on the page load time for the user, and on w.sharethis.com&#8217;s bandwidth, but not on your web server.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Diven II</title>
		<link>http://frankkoehl.com/2009/03/free-open-source-alternative-sharethis-addthis-addtoany/comment-page-1/#comment-817</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Diven II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 19:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankkoehl.com/?p=429#comment-817</guid>
		<description>Touché. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Touché. <img src='http://frankkoehl.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://frankkoehl.com/2009/03/free-open-source-alternative-sharethis-addthis-addtoany/comment-page-1/#comment-815</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 06:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankkoehl.com/?p=429#comment-815</guid>
		<description>This is quickly becoming one of my favorite posts. :)

Ahmed, David, glad to see you both made your way over here. I completely missed the fact that the customizability pretty much requires individual images, so I&#039;m glad you decided to chime in.

Let me take this opportunity to give my heartfelt thanks for the work you&#039;ve done on this product thus far. It&#039;s fantastic. I hope it provides the professional exposure you deserve for the work.

To be fair, I think Pat does an excellent job articulating the strengths of his software, and those arguments are not without some merit. I do genuinely believe that Add to Any could break away from the pack if they started pushing the localized version of their software. 

But open source software always provides a unique advantage over any corporate product. All things being equal &#8212; which in this case I&#039;d say they are &#8212; open source always has the advantage.

David, I&#039;ve installed the update and it works beautifully. Thanks for the fixes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is quickly becoming one of my favorite posts. <img src='http://frankkoehl.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Ahmed, David, glad to see you both made your way over here. I completely missed the fact that the customizability pretty much requires individual images, so I&#8217;m glad you decided to chime in.</p>
<p>Let me take this opportunity to give my heartfelt thanks for the work you&#8217;ve done on this product thus far. It&#8217;s fantastic. I hope it provides the professional exposure you deserve for the work.</p>
<p>To be fair, I think Pat does an excellent job articulating the strengths of his software, and those arguments are not without some merit. I do genuinely believe that Add to Any could break away from the pack if they started pushing the localized version of their software. </p>
<p>But open source software always provides a unique advantage over any corporate product. All things being equal &mdash; which in this case I&#8217;d say they are &mdash; open source always has the advantage.</p>
<p>David, I&#8217;ve installed the update and it works beautifully. Thanks for the fixes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
